An Evaluation of the Role of the Investment Code Act, 1991, In Promoting, Facilitating and Supervising Investment in Uganda
| dc.contributor.author | Charles Chidozie, Ajaegbu | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2019-11-21T07:04:29Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2019-11-21T07:04:29Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2011-10 | |
| dc.description | A Thesis Presented to the School of Postgraduate Studies and Research Kampala International University Kampala, Uganda in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts in Economics | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | The study investigates the effect of investment promotion, facilitation and regulation on investments in general and banking as a specific sector in Uganda. Since enactment of the Investment Code Act 1991, there has been no recent serious academic inquiry into the effectiveness of these tools that were put in place. The few studies that exist are very old such as those of Obwona (2000) and Kibikyo (2000). The study uses mostly secondary data and interviews on investments in Uganda. Secondary data and some interviews were used in the research. Analysis was qualitative. The findings show that UIA has been promoting investments through trade fairs, missions abroad and investment conferences since 1991. A number of opportunities exist in the entire economy. Those that have been targeted as priority sectors, however, include agriculture, ICT, Energy, health, education, mining and services such as tourism and finance. In terms of countries, UIA has targeted UK, USA, Kenya (EAC), South Africa, India, China, UAE and Singapore. Problems abound, however. UIA neither provided investors important investment information like geological data and mineral targets that could be used, as a basis for attracting serious investors nor extension services, training and mining equipment. Also, although Tour/cm is number three on the fist of the national primary growth areas of the newly released National Development Plan (NDP) Coming after agriculture and forest,~ it got a miserable amount from the budget. Based on the number of firms licensed, therefore, the promotion efforts were effective between 1991 and 1995, but since then other factors have determined FDI such as the discovery of oil in the Albertine region and the credit crunch of the 2009. With facilitation, while protection of FDI was in place, the problems associated with the licensing of investors as well as the physical infrastructure in the country needed tackling to impact on FDI inflow. As such, facilitation impacted on FDI inflow in a mixed manner. With the exception of protection, including the swift and equitable resolution of Investment disputes, Uganda fared badly as far facilitation was concerned. First, Unlike Rwanda where an entrepreneur goes through only two procedures in three days to start a business, in Uganda an investor goes through 18 procedures in 25 days. Uganda was ranked 112th out of 183 world economies surveyed on the ease of doing business | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12306/3786 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Kampala International University, masters of Arts in economics | en_US |
| dc.subject | An Evaluation of the Role of the Investment Code Act, 1991 | en_US |
| dc.subject | Facilitating and Supervising Investment in Uganda | en_US |
| dc.title | An Evaluation of the Role of the Investment Code Act, 1991, In Promoting, Facilitating and Supervising Investment in Uganda | en_US |
| dc.type | Other | en_US |